Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Abu‐Hijleh, S F and Ibbs, C W (1989) Schedule‐Based Construction Incentives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 430–43.

Davis, K, Ledbetter, W B and Burati, J L (1989) Measuring Design and Construction Quality Costs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 385–400.

Eldin, N N (1989) Measurement of Work Progress: Quantitative Technique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 462–74.

Hughes, P J, O'Connor, J T and Traver, A E (1989) Pipe Manipulator Enhancements for Increased Automation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 412–23.

Ioannou, P G (1989) Evaluation of Subsurface Exploration Programs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 339–56.

Johnston, D W, Kahn, K P and Phillips, J B (1989) Formwork Pressures in Tall and Thick Concrete Walls. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 444–61.

Reda, R and Carr, R I (1989) Time‐Cost Trade‐Off Among Related Activities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 475–86.

Rutherford, A W (1989) Organizational Evolution I‐595 Port Everglades Expressway. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 357–69.

Shanmuganayagam, V (1989) Current Float Techniques for Resources Scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 401–11.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Resource management; Resource allocation; Algorithms; Models; Critical path method;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1989)115:3(401)
  • Abstract:
    This paper concerns resources scheduling using a simple heuristic model described as the “current float” model. Current sfloat is defined as the finish float available with respect to its latest finish time in the original network computations. The current float model allocates limited resources by giving priority to the activity that has the least current float. The current floats need be computed only for those activities that are engaged in a resource conflict. The “total float” models that were used previously required the tedious task of constructing and computing a status network every time an activity is postponed due to nonavailability of resources. The current float model avoids this and requires only the original network computations. The mathematical validity of the model is explained, and the paper presents proof that the output of this model is the same as that of the total float model. The physical significance of the model is also indicated. An application section is included to illustrate the working of the model.

Thomas, H R, Sanvido, V E and Sanders, S R (1989) Impact of Material Management on Productivity—A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(03), 370–84.